1Babol Noshirvani University of Technology- Mechanical engineering department
2Board of science of Babol Noshirvani University of Technology- Mechanical engineering department
3Board of science of Babol Noshirvani University of Technology- material engineering department
4Islamic Azad University, Sari branch, Mechanical engineering department
Effect of clamping pressure on electrical resistance between Gas diffusion layer (GDL) and bipolar plate is a very important parameter in Proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells. For investigation of this matter some researches have been done in these years. But there is not an experimental investigation of clamping pressure effect on PEM electrical resistance. In this paper, some experimental tests have been performed with various clamping pressures in order to find the relationship between clamping pressure and electrical resistance. The same situations have been simulated in Abaqus software and their results have been compared to each other. Some models with different situations of clamping pressure and thickness of end plate for uniform pressure distribution on the gas diffusion layer have been obtained and these models have been investigated for electrical analysis. These models have been imported to electrical and mechanical analysis with putting electrical loads and boundary conditions. At the end, results of the investigation showed that PEM fuel cell with more clamping pressure and end plate thickness has less electrical resistance. Stress and electrical resistance have reversed relationship to each other. In other word by increasing in clamping pressure, electrical resistance between gas diffusion layer and bipolar plate will reduce and vice versa.
 B.C.H. Steele, A. Heinzel, Nature (London) 414.6861 (2001): 345-352.
 S.J.C. Cleghorn, X. Ren, T. Espringer, M.S. Wilson, C. Zawodzinski, T.A. Azwodzinski, S. Gottesfeld, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 22.12 (1997): 1137-1144.
 D. Chu, R. Jiang, J. Power Sources 80.1 (1999): 226-234.
 J. Ihonen, F. Jaouen, G. Lindbergh, G. Sundholm, Electrochim. Acta 46.19 (2001): 2899-2911.
 C.E. Borroni-Bird, J. Power Sources 61.1 (1996): 33-48.
 K.B. Prater, J. Power Sources 61.1 (1996) 105-109.
 W. Smith, J. Power Sources 86.1 (2000) 74-83.
 O.J. Murphy, A. Cisar, E. Clarke, Electrochim. Acta 43.24 (1998) 3829-3840.
 R.V. Helmolt, U. Eberle, J. Power Sources 165 (2007) 833–843.
 A. Kundu, J.H. Jang, J.H. Gil, C.R. Jung, H.R. Lee, S.H. Kim, B. Ku, Y.S. Oh, J. Power Sources 170 (2007) 67–78.
 A.S. Patil, T.G. Dubois, N. Sifer, E. Bostic, K. Gardner, M. Quah, C. Bolton, J. Power Sources 136 (2004) 220–225.
 M. Uzunoglu, O.C. Onar, M.S. Alam, J. Power Sources 168 (2007) 240–250.
 S. Karvonen, T. Hottinen, J. Ihonen, H. Uusalo, ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 5 (2008) 1–9.
 P. Zhou, C.W.Wu, G.J. Ma, J. Power Sources 159 (2006) 1115–1122.
 P. Zhou, C.W. Wu, G.J. Ma, J. Power Sources 163 (2007) 874–881.
 P. Zhou, C.W.Wu, J. Power Sources 170 (2007) 93–100.
 L. Cinderlla, A.M. Kannan, J.F. Lin, K. Saminathan, Y. Ho, C.W. Lin, J. Wertz, J. Power Sources 194 (2009) 146–160.
 S.J. Lee, C.D. Hsu, C.H. Huang, J. Power Sources 145 (2005) 53–361.
 H.L.Wang, M.A. Sweikart, J.A. Turner, J. Power Sources 115 (2003) 243–251.
 V. Mishra, F. Yang, R. Pitchumani, ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 1 (2004) 2–9.
 J. Ihonen, F. Jaouen, G. Lindbergh, G. Sundholm, Electrochim. Acta 46 (2001) 2899–2911.
 W.-K. Lee, C.-H. Ho, J.W. Van Zee, M. Murthy, J. Power Sources 84 (1999) 45–51.
 W.R. Chang, J.J. Hwang, F.B. Weng, S.H. Chan, J. Power Sources 166 (2007) 149–154.
 J. Ge, A. Higier, H. Liu, J. Power Sources 159 (2006) 922–927.
 S.J. Lee, C.D. Hsu, C.H. Huang, J. Power Sources 145 (2005) 353–361.
 L. Zhang, Y. Liu, H. Song, S.Wang, Y.Y. Zhou, S.J. Hu, J. Power Sources 162 (2006) 1165–1171.
 Lai, Xinmin, Linfa Peng, and Jun Ni. "A mechanical–electrical finite element method model for predicting contact resistance between bipolar plate and gas diffusion layer in PEM fuel cells." Journal of Power Sources 182.1 (2008): 153-159.