In this paper, the capability of the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) approach is evaluated to reliably predict the fluid dynamic and the separation performance of Pd membranes modules for gas mixture separation. In this approach, the flow fields of the pressure and velocity for the gas mixture and the species concentration distribution in the selected three-dimensional domains are obtained by simultaneous and numerical solution of continuity, momentum, and species transport (especially, gas-through-gas diffusion term that derived from the Stefan–Maxwell formulation) equations. Therefore, the calculation of the hydrogen permeation depends on the local determination of the mass transfer resistance caused by the gas phase and membrane, which is modeled as a permeable surface of known characteristics. The applicability of the model to properly predict the separation process under a wide range of pressure, feed flow rate, temperature, and gas mixtures composition is assessed through a strict comparison with experimental data. Moreover, in this work, the influence of inhibitor species on the module performance is discussed, which is obtained by implementing the CFD model. The results of the simulation showed that increasing the pressure on the feed side increases the molar fraction of hydrogen gas, the feed inlet flow on the shell side, and the hydrogen permeation through the membrane in the tube side. Comparison of simulation results with laboratory data showed good agreement. The model was obtained with an error of less than 3% at 450K and below 6% for 475K and 500K.
Chein, R.-Y., et al., Numerical modeling of hydrogen production from ammonia decomposition for fuel cell applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010. 35(2): p. 589-597.
Iulianelli, A., F. Dalena, and A. Basile, Steam reforming, preferential oxidation, and autothermal reforming of ethanol for hydrogen production in membrane reactors, in Ethanol. 2019, Elsevier. p. 193-213.
Jamshidi, S. and A. Babaluo, Preparation and evaluation of Pd membrane on supports activated by PEG embedded Pd nanoparticles for ATR membrane reactor. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 2020. 147: p. 107736.
Koroneos, C., Dompros, A., Roumbas, G. and Moussiopoulos, N., Life cycle assessment of hydrogen fuel production processes. International journal of hydrogen energy. 2004. 29: p. pp.1443-1450.
Omidifar, M., S. Shafiei, and H. Soltani, Optimization of Hydrogen Distribution Network by Imperialist Competitive Algorithm. 2016.
Dalla Fontana, A., et al., Hydrogen permeation and surface properties of PdAu and PdAgAu membranes in the presence of CO, CO2, and H2S. Journal of membrane science, 2018. 563: p. 351-359.
Liu, P.K., M. Sahimi, and T.T. Tsotsis, Process intensification in hydrogen production from coal and biomass via the use of membrane-based reactive separations. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 2012. 1(3): p. 342-351.
Al-Mufachi, N., N. Rees, and R. Steinberger-Wilkens, Hydrogen selective membranes: A review of palladium-based dense metal membranes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015. 47: p. 540-551.
Chen, W.-H., et al., Hysteresis and reaction characterization of methane catalytic partial oxidation on rhodium catalyst. Journal of Power Sources, 2009. 194(1): p. 467-477.
Jamshidi, S., et al., Preparation of Pd composite membrane via organic-inorganic activation method in electroless plating technique. Iranian Journal of Hydrogen & Fuel Cell, 2015. 2(3): p. 151-158.
Jamshidi, S., et al., Performance of Pd composite membrane prepared by the organic-inorganic method in WGS membrane reactor. Separation Science and Technology, 2016. 51(11): p. 1891-1899.
Majlan, E.H., et al., Hydrogen purification using compact pressure swing adsorption system for the fuel cell. international journal of hydrogen energy, 2009. 34(6): p. 2771-2777.
Yun, S. and S.T. Oyama, Correlations in palladium membranes for hydrogen separation: A review. Journal of membrane science, 2011. 375(1-2): p. 28-45.
Chen, W.-H., and Y.-J. Syo, Thermal behavior and hydrogen production of methanol steam reforming and autothermal reforming with spiral preheating. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2011. 36(5): p. 3397-3408.
Lattin, W. and V.P. Utgikar, Transition to a hydrogen economy in the United States: A 2006 status report. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007. 32(15): p. 3230-3237.
Chen, W.-H., and Y.-J. Syu, Hydrogen production from water gas shift reaction in a high gravity (Higee) environment using a rotating packed bed. international journal of hydrogen energy, 2010. 35(19): p. 10179-10189.
Coroneo, M., et al., Modelling the effect of operating conditions on hydrodynamics and mass transfer in a Pd–Ag membrane module for H2 purification. Journal of Membrane Science, 2009. 343(1-2): p. 34-41.
Coroneo, M., et al., CFD modeling of inorganic membrane modules for gas mixture separation. Chemical Engineering Science, 2009. 64(5): p. 1085-1094.
Darabi, Z., Babaluo, A.A. and Jamshidi, S., 2018. Palladium composite membrane with high reversibility of CO2 poisoning. Iranian Journal of Hydrogen & Fuel Cell, 5(1), pp.13-19.
Khodaei, M., Darabi, Z., Omidifar, M., & Babaluo*, A. A. (2022). Modeling and simulation of the fluid dynamic and performance of the Pd-based membrane by CFD for hydrogen separation. Hydrogen, Fuel Cell & Energy Storage, 9(1), 19-25. doi: 10.22104/ijhfc.2021.4915.1226
Milad Khodaei; Zeinab Darabi; Mina Omidifar; Ali Akbar Babaluo*. "Modeling and simulation of the fluid dynamic and performance of the Pd-based membrane by CFD for hydrogen separation". Hydrogen, Fuel Cell & Energy Storage, 9, 1, 2022, 19-25. doi: 10.22104/ijhfc.2021.4915.1226
Khodaei, M., Darabi, Z., Omidifar, M., Babaluo*, A. A. (2022). 'Modeling and simulation of the fluid dynamic and performance of the Pd-based membrane by CFD for hydrogen separation', Hydrogen, Fuel Cell & Energy Storage, 9(1), pp. 19-25. doi: 10.22104/ijhfc.2021.4915.1226
Khodaei, M., Darabi, Z., Omidifar, M., Babaluo*, A. A. Modeling and simulation of the fluid dynamic and performance of the Pd-based membrane by CFD for hydrogen separation. Hydrogen, Fuel Cell & Energy Storage, 2022; 9(1): 19-25. doi: 10.22104/ijhfc.2021.4915.1226